Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 37%).
- Racing Club held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 427Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.