Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 0.40, Δ 1.71).
- Racing Club fired more attempts (22 vs 6 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 81%Lead | Ball possession | 19% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 48% |
| 563Lead | Accurate passes | 69 |
| 626Lead | Total passes | 144 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.13 | Goals prevented | 0.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.