Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 0.70, Δ 0.38).
- River Plate fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- River Plate held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 146 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 218 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.07 | Goals prevented | 0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |