Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.81 vs 0.93, Δ 0.88).
- Racing Club fired more attempts (24 vs 14 shots).
- Racing Club was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 1.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 54% |
| 500Lead | Accurate passes | 145 |
| 610Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 1Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.