Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (2.53 vs 0.28, Δ 2.25).
- Racing Club fired more attempts (23 vs 4 shots).
- Velez Sarsfield held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 181 | Accurate passes | 261Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 380Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 2.04 | Goals prevented | 2.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |