Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Louisville W fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 30%).
- Racing Louisville W held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 500Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 573Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |