Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dash W fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 295Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 399Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.