Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Louisville W fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 345 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 423 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |