Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando Pride W created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 3.24, Δ 1.46).
- Orlando Pride W fired more attempts (27 vs 11 shots).
- Orlando Pride W held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.24Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 27Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 169 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 265 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Orlando Pride W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |