Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego Wave W fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
- San Diego Wave W held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 375Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |