Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Louisville W fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 348Lead | Accurate passes | 345 |
| 429 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Louisville W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |