Match statistics snapshot
- Wanderers fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Racing Montevideo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 23%).
- Wanderers held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Montevideo | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Montevideo | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 54% | Pass accuracy | 63%Lead |
| 117 | Accurate passes | 189Lead |
| 218 | Total passes | 302Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Montevideo | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Montevideo | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Montevideo | Statistic | Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |