Sportra logo
LiveLeaguesNewsGameplayProfile
LiveLeaguesNewsGameplayProfile
HomeLive ScoresLeaguesNewsAboutSportra IntelligenceContactPrivacyCookiesTermsDMCAAttribution

© 2026 Sportra. All rights reserved.

Built by TwinForge · TwinsLegacy

Racing Santander vs Barcelona Match Statistics & xG

RSRacing SantanderRacing Santander
0 — 2FT…
BABarcelonaBarcelona
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsOdds (pre)Odds (live)FormInjuriesH2HNews

Racing Santander vs Barcelona match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for Racing Santander vs Barcelona in Copa del Rey.

Updated 2026-06-10T15:44:15.858763Z

Match statistics snapshot

  • Barcelona created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 3.13, Δ 2.39).
  • Barcelona fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
  • Racing Santander was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
RSRacing SantanderRacing SantandervsBarcelonaBABarcelona

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Racing SantanderStatisticBarcelona
0.74
Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.
3.13Lead
10
OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.
5Lead
3
Shots inside the box
10Lead
1
Shots off target
6Lead
3
Shots on target
7Lead
3
Shots outside the box
7Lead
6
Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.
17Lead

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Racing SantanderStatisticBarcelona
23%
Ball possession
77%Lead
63%
Pass accuracy
88%Lead
130
Accurate passes
641Lead
207
Total passes
728Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Racing SantanderStatisticBarcelona
3
Corner kicks
10Lead

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Racing SantanderStatisticBarcelona
2
Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.
4Lead
5Lead
Goalkeeper saves
3
Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Racing SantanderStatisticBarcelona
13
Fouls
11Lead
0
Red cards
0
4
Yellow cards
1Lead

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Racing SantanderBarcelona
◎

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Barcelona leads this block

1Racing Santander
duels won
2Barcelona

Racing Santander leads shot accuracy (+21% vs Barcelona)

  1. 1

    Shot accuracy

    Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.

    Racing Santander50%55% share
    vs
    Barcelona41%45% share

    Racing Santander leads shot accuracy (+21% vs Barcelona)

  2. 2

    xG per shot

    Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.

    Racing Santander0.12340% share
    vs
    Barcelona0.18460% share

    Barcelona leads shot quality (+49% vs Racing Santander)

  3. 3

    Inside box ratio

    How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.

    Racing Santander50%46% share
    vs
    Barcelona59%54% share

    Barcelona leads box penetration (+18% vs Racing Santander)

⇄

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Racing Santander
duels won
1Barcelona

Barcelona leads possession efficiency (+26% vs Racing Santander)

  1. 1

    xG per possession %

    Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.

    Racing Santander0.03244% share
    vs
    Barcelona0.04156% share

    Barcelona leads possession efficiency (+26% vs Racing Santander)

  2. 2

    Passes per shot

    Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.

    Racing Santander3545% share
    vs
    Barcelona4355% share

    Barcelona — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

↑

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Barcelona leads this block

0Racing Santander
duels won
1Barcelona

Barcelona leads territorial pressure (+193% vs Racing Santander)

  1. 1

    Attack pressure score

    Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.

    Racing Santander1425% share
    vs
    Barcelona4175% share

    Barcelona leads territorial pressure (+193% vs Racing Santander)

⛨

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Racing Santander
duels won
1Barcelona

Barcelona — stronger shot quality allowed

  1. 1

    xGA per shot conceded

    Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.

    Racing Santander0.18460% share
    vs
    Barcelona0.12340% share

    Barcelona — stronger shot quality allowed

  2. 2

    Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

    xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.

    Racing Santander0.6372% share
    vs
    Barcelona0.2528% share

    Racing Santander leads keeper workload (+154% vs Barcelona)

◈

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Barcelona leads this block

2Racing Santander
duels won
4Barcelona

Barcelona had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.

  1. 1

    Aggression rating

    Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.

    Racing Santander21.062% share
    vs
    Barcelona13.038% share

    Racing Santander leads (21.0 vs 13.0).

  2. 2

    Control rating

    Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.

    Racing Santander14.518% share
    vs
    Barcelona67.882% share

    Barcelona leads (67.8 vs 14.5).

  3. 3

    Siege pressure

    Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.

    Racing Santander6.023% share
    vs
    Barcelona20.077% share

    Barcelona leads (20.0 vs 6.0).

  4. 4

    Clinical index (xG/shot)

    xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.

    Racing Santander0.12340% share
    vs
    Barcelona0.18460% share

    Barcelona leads (0.184 vs 0.123).

  5. 5

    Defensive compactness

    Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.

    Racing Santander81.648% share
    vs
    Barcelona87.752% share

    Barcelona leads (87.7 vs 81.6).

  6. 6

    Chaos factor

    Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.

    Racing Santander19.054% share
    vs
    Barcelona16.046% share

    Racing Santander leads (19.0 vs 16.0).