Match statistics snapshot
- Radnicki NIS created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.15, Δ 0.48).
- Radnicki NIS fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Cukaricki was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Radnicki Nis | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Radnicki Nis | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 397Lead | Accurate passes | 136 |
| 483Lead | Total passes | 215 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Radnicki Nis | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Radnicki Nis | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Radnicki Nis | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.