Match statistics snapshot
- Randers FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.25 vs 1.13, Δ 1.12).
- Brondby fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Randers FC was more accurate in front of goal (78% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 2.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 351 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 563Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.