Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 2.00, Δ 1.29).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 379 | Accurate passes | 618Lead |
| 449 | Total passes | 685Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |