Match statistics snapshot
- Randers FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.85, Δ 0.80).
- Randers FC fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Randers FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Fredericia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Fredericia |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 407Lead | Accurate passes | 335 |
| 474Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Fredericia |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Fredericia |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Fc Fredericia |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |