Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.03, Δ 0.07).
- Randers FC fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.