Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.61 vs 1.74, Δ 0.13).
- Viborg fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 422 | Accurate passes | 479Lead |
| 510 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Randers Fc | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.