Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers fired more attempts (26 vs 2 shots).
- Rangers was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
- Rangers held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 10 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 560Lead | Accurate passes | 133 |
| 642Lead | Total passes | 216 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |