Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers fired more attempts (21 vs 3 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- Rangers held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 582Lead | Accurate passes | 145 |
| 656Lead | Total passes | 220 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.