Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers fired more attempts (28 vs 1 shots).
- Rangers was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 0%).
- Rangers held more of the ball (73% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 144 |
| 642Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.