Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers created the clearer chances on xG (3.68 vs 1.43, Δ 2.25).
- Rangers fired more attempts (28 vs 8 shots).
- Rangers was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 3.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 583Lead | Total passes | 259 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rangers | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.