Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid Vienna created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.90, Δ 1.13).
- Rapid Vienna fired more attempts (23 vs 12 shots).
- Rapid Vienna was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 503Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |