Match statistics snapshot
- Ried created the clearer chances on xG (1.59 vs 2.58, Δ 0.99).
- Rapid Vienna fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Ried was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 1.59 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.58Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 131 |
| 391Lead | Total passes | 207 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |