Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid Vienna created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.48, Δ 1.55).
- Rapid Vienna fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Rapid Vienna was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 300Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 350Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.30 | Goals prevented | 0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid Vienna | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |