Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (3.80 vs 1.69, Δ 2.11).
- Rapid fired more attempts (25 vs 15 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 3.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.69 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 311Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |