Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (2.10 vs 1.56, Δ 0.54).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.56 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 332Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |