Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 1.05, Δ 0.27).
- Rapid fired more attempts (24 vs 15 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 438Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |