Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.62, Δ 1.03).
- Rapid fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 265 | Accurate passes | 457Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |