Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.46, Δ 0.36).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 336Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.