Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.60, Δ 0.93).
- Rapid fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 422Lead | Accurate passes | 384 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.