Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 3.45, Δ 3.05).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.45Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 335 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.