Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.18, Δ 0.45).
- Rapid fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 385 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 470 | Total passes | 543Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.