Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.82, Δ 0.67).
- Rapid fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.