Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.88, Δ 0.28).
- Universitatea Craiova fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rapid | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.