Match statistics snapshot
- Barnsley fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 19%).
- Reading held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 367Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |