Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%).
- Reading held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 362Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 468Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |