Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Reading 0-0 Birmingham Statistics
Reading vs Birmingham
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 275 | Accurate passes | 302Lead |
| 399 | Total passes | 413Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |