Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Bolton was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Bolton |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Bolton |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 276Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 402Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Bolton |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Bolton |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Bolton |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.