Match statistics snapshot
- Bristol Rovers fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 319 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |