Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Burton Albion was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Burton Albion |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Burton Albion |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 350 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 444Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Burton Albion |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Burton Albion |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Burton Albion |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |