Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 27%).
- Reading held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 584Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.