Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 10%).
- Reading held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 257Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 382Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |