Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Exeter City was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 360 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 474 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |