Match statistics snapshot
- Fulham fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 32%).
- Fulham held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 232 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 16Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |