Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 26%).
- Reading held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 582Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 655Lead | Total passes | 269 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |