Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 0.78, Δ 0.05).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 271 | Accurate passes | 278Lead |
| 358 | Total passes | 366Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.