Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
- Reading held more of the ball (73% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 556Lead | Accurate passes | 154 |
| 656Lead | Total passes | 240 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| Yellow cards |