Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 26%).
- Reading held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 349 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Reading | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |